Group 1 wants x. Group 2 occupies x. Group 1 has the power of violence, force, or the rule of law to force group 2 to surrender x. Group 1 forces group 2 to unoccupy x. Which power was superior? (hivelink)
If group 1 commits selfish, violent, non compassionate actions to forcibly take x from group 2, does group 1 win?
(hivelink)- If everyone agrees to ignore the immoral actions of group 1, not mention the actions, pretend group 1 is morally good and noble, then does group 1 benefit from their ignoble actions? tid:2803 (1) (hivelink)
no youtube